So, let me start by saying that I don't think there's anything inherently wrong or bad about using Twitter as way to express grief or pass on condolences, and I do have to admit a healthy serving of ignorance when it comes to Twitter -- I don't have an account and have no real interest in having one. Maybe it's just because it's called "Twitter" and everybody's little messages are "Tweets" it comes off sounding so lame. I bring forth exhibit A, which is anyone's use of the sentence"I just tweeted." Though the whole thing's really no different than when I clogged the Internet in the late 90s with AIM away messages, and then switched into Facebook & Gmail in the 2000s to spout little "hey look at me!" messages. (Hey, uh, Melvin? Twitter also ain't too different from this here blog you be writin' on.) So yes I know I'm being a little hypocritical. We all want to be noticed.
But.
When really profound events like prominent deaths or natural disasters happen and some of the first things you see are things like So-in-So tweeted this bit of sadness, and that-other-person tweeted his condolences -- I saw an article about Nate Dogg's death that wasn't really an article so much as a catalog of celebrity tweets. Is it incredibly cynical of me to imagine a publicist who has no idea, really, who Nate Dogg was but tells a client that his/her quiet grief isn't enough, that everybody's using this Twitter thing, and that he/she must tweet something really special to stay relevant? -- so when all this happens at once, don't you just feel so...empty? Am I alone in this feeling?
It could be that it's really the events themselves that make me sad, and I'm just taking out my sadness/anger at said events on the messenger, Twitter. But this time taking it out on the messenger does seem somewhat appropriate. It's like getting told by some bro in flip flops and a backwards hat that your gramma just died, but hey man just have a beer and click on this sweet link about cats. I think there's something deeper here that's a little bit harder to confront, and even harder to understand. Really it all just begs a lot of questions. Like, why are people expressing their grief with this technology that limits all expressions to just 140 characters? Why do some people make their grief public while others do so in private? Is there a difference between 1 million tweets of grief and, say, the 20-30,000 humans who grieved together in Liverpool when John Lennon was killed? Does a GriefTweet (I think I just made that up) make someone feel better? And here's a weird one: is it easier to grieve online than it is out in the 'real world'? Oh god, and that brings up another line of questioning: are there people out there who think the Internet isn't really the 'real world'?
I'm not even all that sure what I'm getting at, other than that Twitter smells really intensely like the kind of thing we're going to look back on in 20 years as occasionally useful but mostly just sort of profoundly dumb. Especially when you see a page full of Tweets -- it looks like bathroom stall graffiti. Is that really where you want to grieve?
God I feel old. And cranky. Maybe I should go post on Twitter.
DFW
"They can kill you, but the legalities of eating you are quite a bit dicier"
29 March 2011
25 March 2011
Big time music day
Two new Panda Bear tracks:
The Preakness
Surfer's Hymn (I got my 7-inch order in, did you?)
New Flaming Lips/Neon Indian 12-inch**
Is David Bowie Dying?
**Just a heads up for all ya'll savvy Internet users out there: there is a vinyl-mp3 rip of the full 12-inch floating around the world wide web. Grab yer surfboard and find it; you can do it, I believe in you.
24 March 2011
Lookout! It's Spidey, man
Anyway, maybe it's just me but that kind of info seems pretty relevant, you know, considering Richmond is playing Kansas again for the first time since that game. But, hey, you know you could instead just spend several paragraphs writing about local sports bars with really deep quotes like "That would be great!" or "I so want that to happen!", meaning a VCU or Richmond Final Four berth.
But at least they're writing about the two teams at all - both teams and schools deserve way more recognition. GO SPIDERS
23 March 2011
J. Tillman - Year In The Kingdom
Here's a live version of the first song (the title track) and some discussion about one of the overall themes of the album. He's an interesting person with what seems like a wry sense of humor, but I think he just an honest soul who is incredibly passionate about what he does, which often is tackling the kinds of themes most of us would rather not confront.
Western Vinyl is out-of-stock of the vinyl, but Insound has some and I really strongly suggest purchasing it. It's one of my favorite albums, ever.
15 March 2011
How for to make spell the name of the guy

So?
Interesting stuff
Also for a while the NY Times couldn't figure out how to spell "protester," which I know was causing my former University of Richmond journalism professors some indigestion. Looks like they pretty much have it sorted out by now, though.
And if you really want to be a total grammar snoot (or snootlet, per DFW, for the very young nerds) just head over to ESPN.com. Make sure to be alone in a dark room while you laugh because no one else is going to care. Except me, of course.
08 March 2011
Engine Down
Been going back to these guys a lot lately -- they used to play all around Richmond when I was in school and are now no longer a band, and I miss them.
04 March 2011
03 March 2011
Workin' on a new chapter, here's a little snip
Matt was in his front yard firing forearm-sized foam arrows at imaginary targets, targets that became real when Danny and his Mom rounded the corner of Market Dr. and proceeded downhill to his house on Faun Lane. The arrows could go surprisingly far; one needed to slide the hollow arrow over a very phallic part of the plastic bow, pull back a lever simulating pulling a bow-string, and then force the lever forward to expel the arrow with compressed air. Depending on trajectory, wind, and how much force he exerted, Matt discovered that he could make the arrow fly anywhere from nowhere to 30 or 40 feet; or, to give you a better idea, the distance up the sidewalk from his house to the corner Danny and Mom had rounded just in time for a yellow, forearm-sized arrow with blue Nerf feathers on its rear to smack unsuspecting Mom on the forehead just below her hairline, making the kind of dull pock that tennis balls make when hit with poorly strung rackets. Matt also liked to sing “Nerf Bow and Arrow!” – in what can only be described as a deaf person’s voice – to the tune of “Pop goes the weasel!” anytime he succeeded in hitting someone.
The best part about Nerf was that nothing ever hurt. And because it should have hurt but didn't, and instead almost always made this silly noise, getting hit with one of the things was always a funny experience. For adults it would be somewhat like having the ability to shoot each other with real guns/bullets without any of the Thanatoptic consequences. Though this begs the question: Why is pretending to kill each other so much fun?
The best part about Nerf was that nothing ever hurt. And because it should have hurt but didn't, and instead almost always made this silly noise, getting hit with one of the things was always a funny experience. For adults it would be somewhat like having the ability to shoot each other with real guns/bullets without any of the Thanatoptic consequences. Though this begs the question: Why is pretending to kill each other so much fun?
02 March 2011
Feeling like an asshole?

Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)